I am what you could call a normal bike riding enthusiast. I
don’t have the best bike and I don’t go the fastest but I break a sweat and
burn calories in the spirit of active living. The occasional trek gives a
non-competitive cyclist such as myself much to ponder while travelling the
trails of North East Calgary.
Today got me thinking about common courtesies and the urge
to rush. Occasionally, we’ll run up behind a pedestrian. From experience we’ve
come to learn that mankind seems to have this propensity to deploy technology
at every opportunity. In this case it would be the “bike bell”. I can see
reasons to use it but not in every situation. When it’s a quiet morning and a
pedestrian is sauntering along in thought, I’m inclined to find a way around
like a wide pass that doesn’t jar him / her out of their serenity. Call me strange
but I’m just not in that much of a rush. Then there are those vehicles which offer
a wide pass when it’s safe for them to do so. You know they’ll be looking back
in their rear view mirror. I’ll give them a wave.
Many drivers have an urge to rush and this behaviour is elicited
by vehicle incursions at intersections and through cross walks. You know they
feel guilty when surprised by a bicycle. Traffic regulations require vehicles
to stop in advance of the stop line or in absence of a stop line, slightly in
front of the stop sign. If intersection visibility is unclear, drivers should
then sneak forward. When folks cheat,
pedestrians and bicyclists can be put at risk. Law enforcement seems to have
better things to do than patrol this poor driving habit. Always be on guard at
Distracted driving is a reality and it is a material hazard.
Pedestrians will not mind sharing a sidewalk with a bicycle if the bicycle
yields to pedestrians always, passes with care, and slows down while passing.
It simply makes good common sense to use sidewalks when road conditions such as
narrow shoulders are unsafe to share with drivers.
I’ve seen some initial reaction to this deal and thought…why not take a closer look at what is available for information. Did you know that there is a “land option” within this deal whereby the Flames have the “option” to acquire and develop nearby lands which have not been wholly disclosed in total? What’s the option price and the current market value of such lands? The “majority” of event revenue will go to the flames and it appears by induction we are lead to believe that this “majority” amount will be 98 per cent with 2 per cent ascribed back to the city as a “facility fee” capped at $3M for the first five years. CTV news has me believing this is all the city is going to get with respect to revenues. Just so this is clear….Calgary will pay half building costs and receive back 2 per cent of revenues. No parking. It’s Just 2 per cent of aggregate revenues. You best hope that people still like hockey in 20 years.
Break even cash flow is what’s going to prevent a tax increase. I’m suspect….yet the city apparently is promising no tax increase in lieu of the deal. The facility fee would be the biggest single revenue source with respect to the city’s interest and this is a huge variable dependent upon the Flames ability to book events in addition to its hockey games. The naming rights are chump change. Would there be finance charges associated with the City’s construction and demolition component? How is the non-sporting taxpaying Calgarian supposed to benefit from a non-descript “community engagement program” or “community sports funding”? Are these payments back to the city indexed for inflation? What if the Flames organization runs into financial trouble and becomes ill equipped to pay these amounts which are the second most material source of city benefit? Yes, benefit and not cash given the funds would be allocated to special interest group(s) and not available to appease shortfalls. As for accessory tax revenue from adjacent businesses – well in theory alternative developments would also generate such revenues.
What is a market maker? A market maker was an investment industry professional who had a responsibility to create a market in an environment of low liquidity. This was manual job when automated trading was not fully deployed. The market maker represented a firm with a seat on the exchange and would put up a bid or sell order in order to create the market among stock issues of low or nil volume. With fewer retail investors looking to trade, the market maker has taken up business elsewhere. Why is this topic relevant you ask? Well, Jim Rickards – author of Currency Wars claims that when the next stock market crash arrives, it could be a quick turn south without market makers stepping in to purchase during a panic. Sure, there are triggers to seize trading amidst a panic but what about when the light turns green once again.
In a market which quickly turns negative, mutual funds would
be relying on fund managers to be decisive and quick at the switch – but with mutual
fund’s exposure to such large relative weighting in one stock compared to a
retail investor, how orderly could an exit be? The mechanics of trading in a
stock market are worthy of anyone’s attention. Are there hedge’s available to
you, the retail investor, which are not being disclosed to you because of a
misconceived “fiduciary duty” which a broker thinks he possesses. That is, a
notion that you lack sophistication to understand a hedge. Education in finance
is important to all. Bankers should not be suggesting you lack capacity and of
course you’re familiar with your responsibility to manage your finances.
Yes. This is Donald Trump and he holds the highest office in the United States of America. You cannot defend the assertion of “crass with no class” by simply deferring to an alignment with his public policy. This is what’s been done over the past two years among those who have been defending him. You see, I actually draw a correlation between personality, personal conduct, derogatory references to minorities, and the potential for leadership mistakes. I also empathize with voters who have been disenfranchised with Washington lobbyists and governmental mismanagement leading up to a radical choice in the Republican nominee. For context, we have the latest “tweet” pertaining to the Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Pressley, Tlaib “squad” suggesting they return to their countries despite three of the four who have only known the United States.
The biggest trouble with these crass twitter remarks is the
lack of condemnation by his peers. It’s apparent that his political peers are
either afraid to rebuke his tirades in fear of reprisals or fear of becoming
the actual target of yet one more of his rants. Oh yes, then there’s the fear
of a defamation lawsuit in the back drop of man who threatens like a school
yard bully. It’s dysfunction at its
finest and in spite of being conservative in my ideology, I’ll be looking
deeply into the eyes of those who dismiss Trump’s abounding personal insults as
frivolous. The evidence of him being intolerant is abundant within the public
domain during his short tenure as President never mind any private relational
discord he would have encountered prior.
Lindsay Graham has
remarked but there was no rebuke. This is the same Lindsay Graham who endured
insults from the tongue of Trump during the contest for Republican nominee. To
be quiet amidst undeserving personal attacks of peers seeming to be racist is
to condone if travelling in circles around the President. When a nation cannot
conduct debate with dignity, good faith and confidence erodes.
If “values” matter as a principal in governance, then Mr.
Trump fails. If U.S “financial solvency” becomes the primary bench mark in
which Trump presides and somehow his leadership facilitates the return to fiscal
prudence, he’ll have a success. Or, his experience in bankruptcy and his
capacity to offend may actually serve him well should the U.S. federal debt
become unserviceable during his tenure.
So, your game of the week got cancelled but you still want
to work on your strokes. Do visit the board at your local community centre but
practice with it the right way. The right way you ask? Since the set up is
crucial as a prefix for delivering a ground stroke, it makes no sense to be
scrambling with the board since the ball returns so quickly. Instead, feed the
ball to the board –make your stroke and only set up for another stroke if in
control and set up properly. The purpose of this practice is to develop
consistency without producing bad habits which can arise when chasing down
How important is this? It’s critical because the neural
pathways need to be developed without the impedence of experience associated
improper mechanics. Similar to golf, tennis is difficult to pick up without
basic fundamentals learned from somebody. The teaching of tennis has positively
evolved to incorporate larger more forgiving balls and smaller racquets for
youngsters. Becoming versant in
fundamentals is definitely a prerequisite before approaching a board without a
playing partner. There is also no
denying the strength in some of the youtube content. For those who have good
coordination and average athleticism but lack a playing partner, the board can
be a great resource having picked up fundamentals from youtube. Naturally, there’s good and bad content on the
net but it’s mostly good so fear not. You can always hire a tennis teacher
because it’s only in the one on one setting whereby your strokes can be
observed and corrected.
Yes, that’s right – I, Blair Sveinson, am a certified tennis instructor with Tennis Alberta and I invite adults to reach out if keen to take up this wonderful game. I can be reached at 403-397-3110. I’m in Calgary.
If a defending player makes a tag on an offensive player running the base paths but in the process loses control of the ball, so long as the base runner touches the bag or plate, the base runner will be considered “safe”. Hence; if it becomes apparent that if a base runner has made a poor decision to advance yet has committed to the play, within the rules of the came he can contrive a strategy to exert such force on the defender in order to produce a dropped ball. Without question, Mr. Marinich in the Angels Astros game on Saturday July 6th took such a strategy by deviating his path inside the baseline toward the presence of the catcher who was positioned inside the field of play to receive the inbound ball. Had this not been Mr. Marinich’s strategy, the logical path would have been outside the baseline thereby increasing his probability of success by stationing himself further from the ball.
Some MLB pundits are calling for suspension of Marinich
given that catcher Lucroy has sustained an injury. It was indeed a brutal
collision but I suspect Marinich was more motivated by achieving a “safe” call
at home as opposed to hurting Lucroy. It’s apparent to me that the rules of
baseball are more to blame that Marinich. This precise play should give cause
for a rule change.
Yamana Gold, $ 1.92 USD to $2.55 USD for a 32 per cent move
Eldorado Gold (EGO), $ 4.11 USD to $6.22 USD for a 51 per cent move
New Gold (NGD) went from $0.72 CAD to $0.94 CAD for a 30 per
Detour Gold (DGG) went from $13.25 CAD to $16.58 CAD – 25 per
McEwen Mining (MUX) went from 1.39 CAD to $1.82 CAD for a 30
per cent change
Argonaut Gold (AR) went from 1.71 CAD to 1.84 CAD for 7 per cent
Royal Nickel (RNX) – yes a gold company went from $0.50 CAD to $0.64 moving 28 per
….and how much did the price of gold change from Jun 11,
2019 to July 3, 2019? Well, 9.6 per cent.
As you can see, a premium has been offered to companies with moderate market caps compared to the majors. Risk capital would have been well served with positions here.