Sarah Huckabee Sanders needing to apologize for gesticulating at Joe Biden as a
stutterer. Her company with Donald Trump has apparently rubbed off. You know
that Trump would be chastising that Christian outlet which opined he should be
removed from office. The only question was going to the quickness of his tweet.
Would he be able to contain his response until morning or would his ego driven
esteem stricken compulsion have him reach for his twitter account with immediacy?
question in my mind with respect to Trump is not the result of an impeachment
trial but actually the forecasted sociological effect of his broadcasted
depraved behavior in the context of his a position which one would think should
attract virtuous citizens. In other words, if this kind of behavior is to be
rewarded with the presidency, then what message does this send in the context
of how the general populous may behave in their own personal and professional lives
going forward? This is what stirs me.
Furthermore, what does it say about a democracy when elected representatives are so bound by the navel gazing machinations of a political system producing blind loyalty that they compromise their conscience in casting votes on behalf of constituents?
are the ramifications of a legal system tested at the very pinnacle. If faith
in a legal system becomes imperiled due to a process obfuscated by partisan
bias, how would any litigant in a civil action trust an investment in justice
that has been compromised at the very top?
It’s happening whether you like it or not. The digital age is impacting your personal power and your ability to return fire. Here’s an example. Typically after a Uber ride, I will look to my phone so that I can acknowledge the tip request and send one. This morning I had a glaring message pop up with an “I understand” button having me acknowledge Uber’s reference to matters relevant to “behavior” as if my communication on my most recent ride did not meet their standard. It makes me think that my conversation with the driver was actually recorded without notifying me of such. I came to realize during the latter part of the ride that my driver may have been having difficulty understanding me given that English was his second language (he was wearing a turban). In humor, I had referenced the authoritative tone of the satellite guide woman giving directions and then gave her credit when she acknowledged me by name. Could this have been the offending reference? It’s all I can imagine given the completeness of my conversation with the driver.
You see, I used a little sarcasm during our ride to add color to the trip which may have been perceived as something different. I suspect this phenomenon will become less and less of a problem for people over time because people will just stop engaging in small talk flavored with witticism since it will be deemed too much trouble with a risk of negative consequences should banter be misunderstood. In other words, an experience of interpersonal connectedness will be extinguished due to an over sensitive culture awarded favor from daft elites lacking in common sense. After all, it was the Uber app that gave the final word in absence of a North American phone number on their website.
With all the testimony this week on Capitol Hill, believe it
or not there are still pockets of republican law makers squealing with
disbelief still that Trump is guilty as charged. Jim Jordan may be the last man standing and
late night stand up acts will certainly be targeting him for his formulation of
logic. Devin Nunes was another Republican so stained in partisanship over facts
that he thought that somehow by referencing “poor TV ratings” in an
intelligence hearing he’d sway the argument. With all the history of Trump’s
lies, deceit, attacks on the vulnerable, twitter tirades, spinning of a
conspiracy theory (Obama’s birth), associations with criminals (Manafort for
one), apparent deeds of sexual harassment according to some 16 women, countless
civil court cases prior to Presidency, obfuscation of publicizing financial
history (tax returns), personal attacks on citizens competing for presidential
nomination, business intent to operate in corrupt Russia, Mr. Nunes somehow
thought by referencing old newspaper headlines that conflating matters would
help his defence of this sham of a man, Trump.
It’s been a harrowing display of partisanship and very disappointing to witness this presidency along with Trump’s character to those who hold justice dear. It was a great experiment in populism projected onto the American people by voters contemptuous of being marginalized with powerlessness. Ironically, the man sent to Washington to address matters of the powerless has abused the power bestowed upon him and a lot of folks saw it coming including yours truly.
If one fails to
exercise objective thought in the face of political philosophy in a democracy,
there are implications. If one turns a blind eye, one will be caught. It may
not be today or tomorrow, but the facts will emerge. A steadfast adherence to
ideology is healthy but if the implementation of such ideology requires the
suppression and disregard to basic values and human rights, then such
implementation in democratic form will require a reset in order to extinguish
such aberrant conduct. While the trait of loyalty has absolute merit in the
context of executing team cause, blind loyalty tarnished with misdeed has inevitable
negative consequences including collateral damage. As a result of this Trump
debacle, it becomes apparent that the whistle blower provision worked and
thankfully there was an American sharp enough to step forward for the good of
country and his / her fellow patriot to out this reprehensible conduct of
bargaining political gain with earmarked military aid.
Incredulously, there is still the remote possibility that
Republicans will grasp at some kind of rationale for defending a no vote to
impeachment if proceedings actually make it to trial in absence of Trump’s
resignation. I am one conservative ideologue not blinded by partisan ideology
but strident in articulating repercussions from being stubborn and outright
indignant toward thoughtful discourse.
The University of Alberta is actually a pretty good school but continues to bestow honorary degrees. Despite Ron MacLean being a “good guy”, in my estimation he should not be awarded a “degree” from my Alma Mater if he has not earned it. Nor should have David Suzuki or any other recipient be awarded an “Honorary Degree”.
You see, the process of earning a degree requires work and sacrifice. One undertakes course work as an adult in pursuit of career knowledge. Course work may also entail studies of the humanities as supplemental to ones’ core discipline. In fact, at the end of a bachelor’s program, one is positioned to advance a discipline through post graduate studies and research. Those who make it through a Bachelor’s program have sacrificed finance in achieving a “parchment”, likely have undertaken debt, and have consequently have made a personal investment in their profession. Awarding “honorary degrees” to individuals for accomplishments outside the realm of academic endeavour having not completed prescribed curriculum simply debases the degree and frankly offends those who sacrificed in actualizing the requirements set forth from day one. I speak for myself and obviously others but not all.
Do specific citizens deserve recognition aside from that
obtained from community, family, and career compensation? Yes. I do not object
to governments, charities, communities, and sports and arts associations from
awarding its contributors. However; university honorary degrees are simply
The U of A will once again call me this year looking for a “donation”.
Unfortunately, the first year student volunteering his / her time to make the
call will be confronted with my indignant response. This individual in his /
her youth and inexperience to much monetary and absolute in opinion will be
perplexed that such a defined position will be taken.
Colin Kaepernick had a very good 2013 season with the San
Francisco 49ers. It’s been tough to miss him through the news cycle since.
Kaepernick rightfully latched onto the civil rights issue associated with the
Rodney King incident and other precursors galvanizing support toward the Black
Lives Matter movement. Unfortunately, he decided to use his celebrity as a
football player on the sports field as a means for showing his support for the
cause while connecting the matter with disloyalty toward his country. He got
black balled and he should have seen that coming. You see, employers in a free capitalist society
have the right to hire based on their variables deemed important for success.
Disloyalty toward country makes a character statement and potentially
correlates with potential behaviour when it comes to “team interest”. When the
going gets tough, are you going to fold up tent or fight within the means
available to you under a constitution? He chose to whimper in the easiest form
of protest conveniently available to him. I wish him well. He seems sharp and I
suspect he will be able to translate his sporting competitiveness into another
avenue of success.
If you live in Western Canada and you don’t have a winter sport…consider downhill skiing. Here’s why I enjoy it so much.
It’s outside of your routine and you’ll be
amongst others like minded and keen in their pursuit of adventure
You’ll be astonished by the horizon draped
in glaciated peaks as you take a moment having exited the mountain’s highest
You’ll be trading stories about mountains,
runs, conditions, and travel.
Carving the snow and negotiating terrain
become objectives of pursuit. A skill set develops in the spirit of continuous
You will forget your day job. You will have
Start with lessons and advance. There is no
rush. You will not break a leg. Equipment offers protection.
Can you advance in terrain from season to season and challenge your fears?
Experience uniqueness in every mountain and
It’s something you guys can do together.
No two ski trips will be alike.
The man has always been a blow hard advocating violence on
the ice while goading groups against one another whether it be the Players
Association versus the NHL, Swedes vs Canadians, fighters versus non-fighters
or referees versus players. It’s what Canadians have apparently wanted due to
the ratings on Hockey Night In Canada’s first intermission for three decades. I
for one have always seen him for what he is and that is a personality looking
to bait fans from a pulpit that has always frankly been in place for him due to
questionable decisions on every occasion when it’s time for executives to renew
his contract. Politicizing the game of hockey on a Saturday night or talking
player contracts when sitting in front of the TV with family has never made any
sense to me. In spite of my admiration for Ron McLean he has always operated as
a fuel hose for Don during the HNIC segment which in and of itself seemed
dysfunctional. Am I surprised that Ron has been caught in the crossfire? No. He
appeared to be nodding as usual while Cherry ranted about poppies and “you
people” in spite of what I believe is not actually what’s in Ron’s heart.
Frankly, this is what media executives should expect when ratings and a
populous perception of a personality become superimposing variables in
personnel decision making.
Now to the words themselves. Don believed in what he was saying. He believes that people on the streets of Mississauga are not wearing poppies like they used to and it’s obvious that the ethnicity of Mississauga and downtown Toronto has changed immensely over the decades because of immigration. I don’t think he’s wrong in what he’s said in reference to the prevalence of poppies given my experience in North East Calgary. I also believe that with every passing generation, memories will fade and the sense of sacrifice of WWI and WWII veterans will lessen irrespective of skin color. I absolutely witness forgetfulness in government policy particularly with respect to the infringement on freedom via tax and regulatory policy. Referencing people as “you people” is not politically correct and could be viewed as racist. The reference is distasteful as is his character which I came to perceive early on in his days as a commentator in stark contrast to the viewpoint of so many white men. This is his schtick pitting people up against each other. This is an 85 year old man with a limited time spot in order to articulate a message in which HNIC executives unfortunately have condoned simply by renewing his contract and having experience with his history for brashness and off-ice faceoffs. However; I still deem their apology sincere. BTW….still thriving from having cut off my cable TV in 2014.
Denis Shapovalov had an opportunity to become the first
Canadian male tennis player to win a Masters 1000 (most senior level
professional tournament equivalent to a Grand Slam) Series event today matched
up against the number one player in the world, Djokovic. BTW, we still call all
these athletes that leave Canada due to high taxation levels here Canadian in
spite of their departure to tax havens. They like to keep the warmth of our
country in their heart while paying tax abroad. Few really call this fact into
question with respect to any semblance of National allegiance. The athletes
certainly aren’t to blame but it is interesting how we still like to dress them
with the Maple Leaf and discount the lay of the land.
What if Canadian star athletes decided to stay in Canada?
Certainly, governments would benefit from a return of capital on any funding
awarded to athletes in lieu of their elite athletic status during years of
development. This is not to say that particular athletes don’t give back to
Canada upon capturing success in ways other than a direct return of such
government sponsored funding. Then there’s the direct taxation for domestic prize
pools associated with Canadian events such as the Rogers Cup. Residents are expected
to report their world wide income whereas non-residents to do not. In spite of
tax credits awarded to residents for foreign tax paid, the high tax rates in
Canada would most likely supersede tax credits.
Non-residents are expected to pay Canadian tax for earnings on Canadian
In all this hype from the media regarding Bank of Canada
interest rate decisions, and with the charade performed in front of cameras by
sharp dressed smooth talking regulators…..the fact is that a 0.25 “basis” point
move is not going to make one iota of difference when chartered banks have been
widening the differential between retail unsecured rates and the overnight rate
unchecked. Alberta has an “ombudsman” to deal with parties feeling aggrieved by
services administered by the province.
From the standpoint of making complaints against the banking system, you would turn to “The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions”. This agency claims to be “independent” and in the context of interest rate policy whereby any party feels aggrieved, this agency will turn to “usury law” in deliberating the matter of any perceived injustice in interest rate administration. Chartered banks still have lots of leeway available to them in the context of widening retail secured and unsecured rates.
I’m afraid our media is asking the wrong question when facilitating a discussion of the huge headline made yesterday over at the Business News Network, “Canadians Drowning In Debt As 47% Struggle To Cover Costs: MNP”.
Look out Fernie / Sparwood / Blairmore…you’re next. Teck
laying off 500….and it’s yet to be reported exactly where the blue chip miner
is going to apply its cuts. Their steel producing coal isn’t quite as appealing
to the markets. Could it be time to start promoting golf courses and casinos with
the forestry industry also in the doldrums? The sleepy towns of Cranbrook and
Kimberley get by (barely) with the closing of Cominco years ago. This corner of
B.C. is still holding on to some semblance of conservative values in the face
of a rising industrial backlash but it could all be about tourism once the next
movie star catches a glimpse of the Teck open pits fuelling rhetoric for light