happening. Behavioral patterns are being negatively impacted by technology and perturbations
are arising. The full deployment of Artificial Intelligence is rapidly approaching
and there is relatively little push back in the context of understanding
consequences. Few have read any study regarding the impact technology will have
on relationships as we delve mercilessly into the AI age. Decorum, etiquette,
empathetic response, expressions of subtlety and anxiety are all variables of
communication which possess linear paths to a non-digital centre of human
sentient which no computer should be expected to calculate. Yet, objectives will be programmed
mechanically in a stale environment free from considerations of nuance. The
machine will be granted credit instead of crafty hands gifted in experience. Time
made available to under employed workers non-resilient to economic change will choose
causes detrimental to the health of humankind. The moral compass will be eroded
with citizens’ sense of power through work and contribution eroded.
As we speak, legislators have proven to be indifferent to mass murder. The suicide rate in the U.S. has increased 24 percent from 1999 to 2014. Metro cultural zeal has waned in place of commercial real estate interests. Inner cities are being routed in favor of profitable single family dwellings in suburbia where few know their neighbors. Police departments regularly turn a blind eye to civic infractions. The western hemisphere now also identifies matters of corruption specifically. Intransigence between special interests and the common good is alarming. Personal insults by politicians are apparently deemed positive for the campaign trail. Tailgating is now epidemic with zero appetite for enforcement. Drivers spurn distracted driving laws with tinted windows all around. Bullied kids still have no advocate to affect justice. Hockey parents lose their mind over a bad call. Politicians grant subsidies to millionaire athletes and billionaire owners in lieu of a populous apparently charmed by idolatry instead of their own creative pursuit.
I remember Canada differently than the aforementioned prior to the new millennium. I contend that the evolution and deployment of technology in our lives without the capacity of the person to restrict its usefulness is one variable among others which have contributed to civic decline. Oh yes….I did not use “Grammarly” to write this piece. In fact, I’ve come to learn through my relationships that kids are now no longer taught how to hand write in school.
Before I start….let me premise with the statement, I believe in “personal growth”
Here is where I differ from folks who circulate in the industry of “personal growth”. We do most of our learning as humans between the age of 0 and 15 years of age and for developing success habits our parents indeed played a large role in our growth….like it or not. Somewhere along the line in our formative years we were learning about consequences to our behavior. We were learning about rewards emanating from work and behaviors which would lead to successful relationships. We were learning right from wrong, etiquette (maybe), how to overcome, and skills necessary to complete tasks. We were learning adaptations and workarounds. We were up to challenges or we weren’t. If we were not, then we ran the risk of isolation. We learned when not to say what we were thinking. We learned to speak with strength in the right context. We learned how to assess environments with our intuitive senses and feedback mechanisms. All this was going on prior to the age of fifteen. A tremendous amount of stimuli came our way.
personal growth industry wants you to believe that you need to be remade or
remove much of what you had already learned or discard baggage or eliminate
dysfunctional relationships. Some other person is going to do a quick assessment
on your weaknesses having not lived through your years of development assumedly
by injecting a bag of tricks from the self help domain in order to make you new
I suggest that if you believe you need to find a better version of “you” that you assess your situation and work it backward for yourself for starters. Then entertain bringing in somebody else to assist with your own assessment. You do have the capacity to be honest with yourself but you must do so in the context of some reading or watching / listening to course materials in the area in order to stimulate regions within you that yearn to be fortified. Engagement with a practitioner will be much more fruitful having researched yourself first and identified sources of trouble.
It’s difficult to witness the disingenuousness of unqualified people prescribing without the authority to do so. It’s even worse to watch the low esteemed subject themselves to others when they’d be better served in solace with abundant materials available. The kinds of people one wants to see more of in the personal development space are those who have achieved what they’re espousing.
Is Canada corrupt? You go to work every day and pay your taxes. Your taxes are intended to provide services which benefit the public good. Naturally, human resources are required to administer such services. Your government also assesses your country’s standing in the world and maintains relationship with other nations in the context of preserving freedom and quality of life for citizens.
Then we have
a system of commerce which operates under the guise of “capitalism”. In a
capitalist system, small businesses and large businesses operate with particular
reasonable regulations relevant to their industries and such regulations are
imposed also in the context of the “public good”. An inherent trait associated
with “free enterprise” is the right of business to “fail” due to whatever underlying
factors are confronted. It is not the business of governments to pick and
choose winners and losers through political bias, personal relationships, or
preferential treatment due to the geographic jurisdiction of stakeholders. If
such a landscape was permitted to exist, free enterprise would lose its appeal
as a viable commercial system to engage with freewill unencumbered by systemic
learned through an ethics report – your country has failed you because in spite
of you playing by the rules, you’ve come to learned that your federal government
has a interfered in the legal process of a defendant charged with improprieties
in the name of “picking winning and losers” in the capitalist system. One must ask, as a nation, are we any
different from third world countries which make ever day habits of conducting
affairs on such terms?
Apparently the plasticity of the brain is lesser in
adulthood. Hence; you are going to be more challenged to identify pitch. In
fact, musical scholars are claiming that an adult may not be able to develop
perfect pitch but with training and could obtain proficiency in “relative pitch”.
So, don’t despair, this relative pitch is what we need the most when picking
out the next chord in a progression. A key has limitations with respect to
which chords are available and consequently the adult brain now gets to work
with finite possibilities in relative terms.
My youtube channel has one song which I posted that I knew
didn’t sound right but given the nature of my channel oriented around progress
and learning, I didn’t think much of it during the upload. Today, I revisited
the song and searched around on “ultimate guitar” (website) to review some
reader feedback associated with the
chord structure of the selected piece and discovered two flaws. Somebody with a
better ear than mine not only knew it didn’t sound right as scored but he was
able to offer the two corrections. I now look forward to the “redo”. The
process gives me comfort in that I may be going from the phase of “not knowing
what I don’t know” to “knowing what I don’t know” in the context of chord
recognition. At this stage of my development, I am still only reaching for a
chord because of a memorized sequence and not because of ear sense. This contrasts to a professional musician who
made an exclamation on his youtube channel that he showed up at a weekend
festival and was introduced to 18 new songs of which he went right to work on learning
and in short order played rhythm for the band in support. The take away is that
I must listen more carefully to the sounds instead of anxiously searching my
I am what you could call a normal bike riding enthusiast. I
don’t have the best bike and I don’t go the fastest but I break a sweat and
burn calories in the spirit of active living. The occasional trek gives a
non-competitive cyclist such as myself much to ponder while travelling the
trails of North East Calgary.
Today got me thinking about common courtesies and the urge
to rush. Occasionally, we’ll run up behind a pedestrian. From experience we’ve
come to learn that mankind seems to have this propensity to deploy technology
at every opportunity. In this case it would be the “bike bell”. I can see
reasons to use it but not in every situation. When it’s a quiet morning and a
pedestrian is sauntering along in thought, I’m inclined to find a way around
like a wide pass that doesn’t jar him / her out of their serenity. Call me strange
but I’m just not in that much of a rush. Then there are those vehicles which offer
a wide pass when it’s safe for them to do so. You know they’ll be looking back
in their rear view mirror. I’ll give them a wave.
Many drivers have an urge to rush and this behaviour is elicited
by vehicle incursions at intersections and through cross walks. You know they
feel guilty when surprised by a bicycle. Traffic regulations require vehicles
to stop in advance of the stop line or in absence of a stop line, slightly in
front of the stop sign. If intersection visibility is unclear, drivers should
then sneak forward. When folks cheat,
pedestrians and bicyclists can be put at risk. Law enforcement seems to have
better things to do than patrol this poor driving habit. Always be on guard at
Distracted driving is a reality and it is a material hazard.
Pedestrians will not mind sharing a sidewalk with a bicycle if the bicycle
yields to pedestrians always, passes with care, and slows down while passing.
It simply makes good common sense to use sidewalks when road conditions such as
narrow shoulders are unsafe to share with drivers.
I’ve seen some initial reaction to this deal and thought…why not take a closer look at what is available for information. Did you know that there is a “land option” within this deal whereby the Flames have the “option” to acquire and develop nearby lands which have not been wholly disclosed in total? What’s the option price and the current market value of such lands? The “majority” of event revenue will go to the flames and it appears by induction we are lead to believe that this “majority” amount will be 98 per cent with 2 per cent ascribed back to the city as a “facility fee” capped at $3M for the first five years. CTV news has me believing this is all the city is going to get with respect to revenues. Just so this is clear….Calgary will pay half building costs and receive back 2 per cent of revenues. No parking. It’s Just 2 per cent of aggregate revenues. You best hope that people still like hockey in 20 years.
Break even cash flow is what’s going to prevent a tax increase. I’m suspect….yet the city apparently is promising no tax increase in lieu of the deal. The facility fee would be the biggest single revenue source with respect to the city’s interest and this is a huge variable dependent upon the Flames ability to book events in addition to its hockey games. The naming rights are chump change. Would there be finance charges associated with the City’s construction and demolition component? How is the non-sporting taxpaying Calgarian supposed to benefit from a non-descript “community engagement program” or “community sports funding”? Are these payments back to the city indexed for inflation? What if the Flames organization runs into financial trouble and becomes ill equipped to pay these amounts which are the second most material source of city benefit? Yes, benefit and not cash given the funds would be allocated to special interest group(s) and not available to appease shortfalls. As for accessory tax revenue from adjacent businesses – well in theory alternative developments would also generate such revenues.
A market maker was an investment industry professional who
had a responsibility to create a market in an environment of low liquidity. This
was manual job when automated trading was not fully deployed. The market maker
represented a firm with a seat on the exchange and would put up a bid or sell
order in order to create the market among stock issues of low or nil volume.
With fewer retail investors looking to trade, the market maker has taken up
business elsewhere. Why is this topic relevant you ask? Well, Jim Rickards –
author of Currency Wars claims that when the next stock market crash arrives,
it could be a quick turn south without market makers stepping in to purchase
during a panic. Sure, there are triggers to seize trading amidst a panic but
what about when the light turns green once again.
In a market which quickly turns negative, mutual funds would
be relying on fund managers to be decisive and quick at the switch – but with mutual
fund’s exposure to such large relative weighting in one stock compared to a
retail investor, how orderly could an exit be? The mechanics of trading in a
stock market are worthy of anyone’s attention. Are there hedge’s available to
you, the retail investor, which are not being disclosed to you because of a
misconceived “fiduciary duty” which a broker thinks he possesses. That is, a
notion that you lack sophistication to understand a hedge. Education in finance
is important to all. Bankers should not be suggesting you lack capacity and of
course you’re familiar with your responsibility to manage your finances.
Yes. This is Donald Trump and he holds the highest office in the United States of America. You cannot defend the assertion of “crass with no class” by simply deferring to an alignment with his public policy. This is what’s been done over the past two years among those who have been defending him. You see, I actually draw a correlation between personality, personal conduct, derogatory references to minorities, and the potential for leadership mistakes. I also empathize with voters who have been disenfranchised with Washington lobbyists and governmental mismanagement leading up to a radical choice in the Republican nominee. For context, we have the latest “tweet” pertaining to the Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, Pressley, Tlaib “squad” suggesting they return to their countries despite three of the four who have only known the United States.
The biggest trouble with these crass twitter remarks is the
lack of condemnation by his peers. It’s apparent that his political peers are
either afraid to rebuke his tirades in fear of reprisals or fear of becoming
the actual target of yet one more of his rants. Oh yes, then there’s the fear
of a defamation lawsuit in the back drop of man who threatens like a school
yard bully. It’s dysfunction at its
finest and in spite of being conservative in my ideology, I’ll be looking
deeply into the eyes of those who dismiss Trump’s abounding personal insults as
frivolous. The evidence of him being intolerant is abundant within the public
domain during his short tenure as President never mind any private relational
discord he would have encountered prior.
Lindsay Graham has
remarked but there was no rebuke. This is the same Lindsay Graham who endured
insults from the tongue of Trump during the contest for Republican nominee. To
be quiet amidst undeserving personal attacks of peers seeming to be racist is
to condone if travelling in circles around the President. When a nation cannot
conduct debate with dignity, good faith and confidence erodes.
If “values” matter as a principal in governance, then Mr.
Trump fails. If U.S “financial solvency” becomes the primary bench mark in
which Trump presides and somehow his leadership facilitates the return to fiscal
prudence, he’ll have a success. Or, his experience in bankruptcy and his
capacity to offend may actually serve him well should the U.S. federal debt
become unserviceable during his tenure.
So, your game of the week got cancelled but you still want
to work on your strokes. Do visit the board at your local community centre but
practice with it the right way. The right way you ask? Since the set up is
crucial as a prefix for delivering a ground stroke, it makes no sense to be
scrambling with the board since the ball returns so quickly. Instead, feed the
ball to the board –make your stroke and only set up for another stroke if in
control and set up properly. The purpose of this practice is to develop
consistency without producing bad habits which can arise when chasing down
How important is this? It’s critical because the neural
pathways need to be developed without the impedence of experience associated
improper mechanics. Similar to golf, tennis is difficult to pick up without
basic fundamentals learned from somebody. The teaching of tennis has positively
evolved to incorporate larger more forgiving balls and smaller racquets for
youngsters. Becoming versant in
fundamentals is definitely a prerequisite before approaching a board without a
playing partner. There is also no
denying the strength in some of the youtube content. For those who have good
coordination and average athleticism but lack a playing partner, the board can
be a great resource having picked up fundamentals from youtube. Naturally, there’s good and bad content on the
net but it’s mostly good so fear not. You can always hire a tennis teacher
because it’s only in the one on one setting whereby your strokes can be
observed and corrected.
Yes, that’s right – I, Blair Sveinson, am a certified tennis instructor with Tennis Alberta and I invite adults to reach out if keen to take up this wonderful game. I can be reached at 403-397-3110. I’m in Calgary.
If a defending player makes a tag on an offensive player running the base paths but in the process loses control of the ball, so long as the base runner touches the bag or plate, the base runner will be considered “safe”. Hence; if it becomes apparent that if a base runner has made a poor decision to advance yet has committed to the play, within the rules of the came he can contrive a strategy to exert such force on the defender in order to produce a dropped ball. Without question, Mr. Marinich in the Angels Astros game on Saturday July 6th took such a strategy by deviating his path inside the baseline toward the presence of the catcher who was positioned inside the field of play to receive the inbound ball. Had this not been Mr. Marinich’s strategy, the logical path would have been outside the baseline thereby increasing his probability of success by stationing himself further from the ball.
Some MLB pundits are calling for suspension of Marinich
given that catcher Lucroy has sustained an injury. It was indeed a brutal
collision but I suspect Marinich was more motivated by achieving a “safe” call
at home as opposed to hurting Lucroy. It’s apparent to me that the rules of
baseball are more to blame that Marinich. This precise play should give cause
for a rule change.