The man has always been a blow hard advocating violence on
the ice while goading groups against one another whether it be the Players
Association versus the NHL, Swedes vs Canadians, fighters versus non-fighters
or referees versus players. It’s what Canadians have apparently wanted due to
the ratings on Hockey Night In Canada’s first intermission for three decades. I
for one have always seen him for what he is and that is a personality looking
to bait fans from a pulpit that has always frankly been in place for him due to
questionable decisions on every occasion when it’s time for executives to renew
his contract. Politicizing the game of hockey on a Saturday night or talking
player contracts when sitting in front of the TV with family has never made any
sense to me. In spite of my admiration for Ron McLean he has always operated as
a fuel hose for Don during the HNIC segment which in and of itself seemed
dysfunctional. Am I surprised that Ron has been caught in the crossfire? No. He
appeared to be nodding as usual while Cherry ranted about poppies and “you
people” in spite of what I believe is not actually what’s in Ron’s heart.
Frankly, this is what media executives should expect when ratings and a
populous perception of a personality become superimposing variables in
personnel decision making.
Now to the words themselves. Don believed in what he was saying. He believes that people on the streets of Mississauga are not wearing poppies like they used to and it’s obvious that the ethnicity of Mississauga and downtown Toronto has changed immensely over the decades because of immigration. I don’t think he’s wrong in what he’s said in reference to the prevalence of poppies given my experience in North East Calgary. I also believe that with every passing generation, memories will fade and the sense of sacrifice of WWI and WWII veterans will lessen irrespective of skin color. I absolutely witness forgetfulness in government policy particularly with respect to the infringement on freedom via tax and regulatory policy. Referencing people as “you people” is not politically correct and could be viewed as racist. The reference is distasteful as is his character which I came to perceive early on in his days as a commentator in stark contrast to the viewpoint of so many white men. This is his schtick pitting people up against each other. This is an 85 year old man with a limited time spot in order to articulate a message in which HNIC executives unfortunately have condoned simply by renewing his contract and having experience with his history for brashness and off-ice faceoffs. However; I still deem their apology sincere. BTW….still thriving from having cut off my cable TV in 2014.
Denis Shapovalov had an opportunity to become the first
Canadian male tennis player to win a Masters 1000 (most senior level
professional tournament equivalent to a Grand Slam) Series event today matched
up against the number one player in the world, Djokovic. BTW, we still call all
these athletes that leave Canada due to high taxation levels here Canadian in
spite of their departure to tax havens. They like to keep the warmth of our
country in their heart while paying tax abroad. Few really call this fact into
question with respect to any semblance of National allegiance. The athletes
certainly aren’t to blame but it is interesting how we still like to dress them
with the Maple Leaf and discount the lay of the land.
What if Canadian star athletes decided to stay in Canada?
Certainly, governments would benefit from a return of capital on any funding
awarded to athletes in lieu of their elite athletic status during years of
development. This is not to say that particular athletes don’t give back to
Canada upon capturing success in ways other than a direct return of such
government sponsored funding. Then there’s the direct taxation for domestic prize
pools associated with Canadian events such as the Rogers Cup. Residents are expected
to report their world wide income whereas non-residents to do not. In spite of
tax credits awarded to residents for foreign tax paid, the high tax rates in
Canada would most likely supersede tax credits.
Non-residents are expected to pay Canadian tax for earnings on Canadian
In all this hype from the media regarding Bank of Canada
interest rate decisions, and with the charade performed in front of cameras by
sharp dressed smooth talking regulators…..the fact is that a 0.25 “basis” point
move is not going to make one iota of difference when chartered banks have been
widening the differential between retail unsecured rates and the overnight rate
unchecked. Alberta has an “ombudsman” to deal with parties feeling aggrieved by
services administered by the province.
From the standpoint of making complaints against the banking system, you would turn to “The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions”. This agency claims to be “independent” and in the context of interest rate policy whereby any party feels aggrieved, this agency will turn to “usury law” in deliberating the matter of any perceived injustice in interest rate administration. Chartered banks still have lots of leeway available to them in the context of widening retail secured and unsecured rates.
I’m afraid our media is asking the wrong question when facilitating a discussion of the huge headline made yesterday over at the Business News Network, “Canadians Drowning In Debt As 47% Struggle To Cover Costs: MNP”.
Look out Fernie / Sparwood / Blairmore…you’re next. Teck
laying off 500….and it’s yet to be reported exactly where the blue chip miner
is going to apply its cuts. Their steel producing coal isn’t quite as appealing
to the markets. Could it be time to start promoting golf courses and casinos with
the forestry industry also in the doldrums? The sleepy towns of Cranbrook and
Kimberley get by (barely) with the closing of Cominco years ago. This corner of
B.C. is still holding on to some semblance of conservative values in the face
of a rising industrial backlash but it could all be about tourism once the next
movie star catches a glimpse of the Teck open pits fuelling rhetoric for light
Last night while driving home from work, the main drag was
congested so I took a residential route. Naturally, I slowed down to 30km per
hour while driving through a playground zone. As is often the case, there was a
pick-up truck right on my back bumper. I pulled over and let him pass.
Tailgating is an epidemic and law enforcement isn’t interested in pursuing this
infraction with tickets. Drivers will have a propensity for checking their rear
view mirror to see how much closer the ahole is going to get when they should
be keeping an eye out for for children.
Now, imagine driving through this zone at a crawl and then
confronted with a new reduced 40km per hour limit after the playground zone instead
of 50. People will be perturbed while now thinking about what they’re going to
make for dinner or thoughts of being late to pick up the kids. Their focus will
not be on driving as it would be at a reasonable speed of 50km per hour for the
One thing is for sure – if the residential speed limit is
reduced to 40km / hr then a municipality will have more revenues from speeding
tickets generated through camera catches that it would at a speed of 50 km /hr.
We would hope that child safety is the motivator for
considering such a change but I’m suspect. The current residential speed limit
has served Canadians well for decades. Current infractions on the books such as
“failure to stop”, “crosswalk incursions”, “failure to stop in advance of a
stop line”, “failure to signal” do not get enforced. , “Failure to turn into
nearest lane”, “unsafe lane changes”, and “failure to give distance” don’t
apparently get taught in driver’s school or are simply disregarded due to
drivers understanding that sanctions against such poor driving habits will not
You have bloated bureaucracies in Canada looking for places
to turn their attention when what they need to do is execute their current
agenda with precision.
Lastly, you will have mothers who believe this is a good
proposal. I suggest that strong parenting along with common sense supervision
has worked for decades when it comes to children and traffic law.
Canadians condone their national leader in obstructing
justice by casting votes in his direction.
Party leaders oblivious to work schedules (bed times) of
Canadians by delaying speeches in spite of certainty of outcome and botching their
coordination as possible foreshadowing of a dysfunctional minority government.
Failure of pundits to articulate platform of the big winner of the night – Bloc Quebecois, and table thoughts on the degree of their separatist intentions.
Jagmeet Singh obviously still self aggrandizing in his new found stature by speaking at nauseous lengths thanking everyone but his dog as folks sought some semblance of a coherent thought in line with his seat reduction.
A broken country. You
have Quebecers who want all the benefits of being in Canada yet vote like
traitors to the nation. You have elite Ontarians daft in thinking we can pay
our bills through a service driven economy while deficits and the debt
accelerate. You have Maritimers fearful of losing their pogey. You have British
Columbians split through a rural / urban dichotomy. You have the prairies tired
of paying the bills watching politicians trumpet rhetoric with gold plated
You have a pretty elaborate CBC set hosting like sixteen
pundits paid by your tax dollars…all to tell you what you already know. One such
pundit seemed compelled by the occasion to tell a losing MP that she loves her.
Mayor of Calgary, Naheed Nenshi , shows up and actually made sense.
A vain Prime Minister with an embarrassing aloof speech attempting to sound statesman like in his boyhood manner.
A sense that Andrew Scheer may lack the fire in his belly necessary to energize positive change.
I believe last night was the first time in about five years in which I watched two consecutive periods of NHL hockey. Once again I was reminded why I turned off my cable TV those five years ago. It was the Flames versus Kings and HNIC was all over some personal rivalry between two players baiting viewers whether they would fight or not. Then there was the tight checking play with little actual execution of passing and play making. Factor in puck scrambles, scrums, slashing, and goalie screening – it all became very boring to watch. To my surprise, hockey ambassador Brian Burke came on between periods and raved about why a shot clock in overtime is now necessary due to players ragging the puck in a defensive fashion just to solidify the tie. My fellow Calgarians….as a sportsman with an original educational foundation in coaching and athletic training, I suggest you should not be subsidizing this theatre with your tax dollars. Big shout out to Celine at Murdoch’s for her conversational prowess in taking the boredom from this broadcast.
You either believe in you or you believe in the state caring for your needs. You believe in contributing to your own good health or waste your health and expect your government to pick up the tab for your maladies. You believe you can support your children’s growth or you believe that it’s the state’s responsibility. You believe in a free market with responsible regulation or you believe that your government should dictate how and from whom you should purchase goods and services. You expect that your country should pay its bills or you believe that that perpetual increases in debt and deficits have no consequences. You believe that natural resources should be harvested responsibly or you believe that a service oriented economy will in and of itself will be sufficient to provide for the quality of life that you expect. You believe that leaders should be held responsible for corrupt behavior, or not. You believe that the welfare of your neighbor’s children is their responsibility or you believe that your income taxes paid should subsidize them. You believe in lower taxes with governments strictly burdened with administering services specific to the public good such as roads, the rule of law, public education, disease prevention, and reasonable regulation as opposed to higher taxes attributing resources toward the financing of special interest groups such as artists, industry, or hockey players. You condone wasteful government spending or you do not.
My best ten bucks ever spent was last night for a ticket to a cover of Led Zeppelin II at the Deerfoot Inn and Casino. The Mike Mackenzie Band paid tribute with select pieces recorded 50 years ago in addition to this album which most likely launched Zeppelin into super stardom. The huge take away from the evening was the affirmation that there are superb musicians amongst us today that are undiscovered and perhaps even under appreciated. MacKenzie’s vocals are stellar. He played lead while absolutely matching the high pitch of Robert Plant. The acoustics of the venue were good in spite of encountering subtle feedback from keyboards. Mackenzie turned to an old faithful he’s performed with past projects, The Rover from Physical Graffiti. Other standouts included Ramble On and Killing Floor. Killing Floor was one of those 1969 releases which showcased the talent of John Paul Jones on bass. The bass player last night can easily be excused for any misses given the complexity. What Mackenzie may be missing in soloing prowess, he makes up for with versatility and chord voicings.
A standout in the set’s second half was “No Quarter”. I just
love the keyboard intro and the subtlety of this song. It takes good unrushed
time in order to pull this one off and apparently the keys player is new to
this Mackenzie ensemble.
Notable omissions were “Kashmir”, “Dazed and Confused”, and “Since
I’ve Been Loving You”.
The merchandise sales lady referenced a formal jazz
education by Mackenzie right here at Mount Royal College here in Calgary. The man has stage presence and puts the
audience at ease with his charisma. With
Bonham’s death, Page and Plant espoused that nobody could take the place of the
legendary drummer. Well, the rhythm section last night was great support and in
fact such confidence was bestowed the drummer that he performed his own solo.
The rhythm guitarist pitched in admirably with adept acoustic pieces.