Drew Brees should not be the target of race issues when his only deed to apparently offend is to stand tall during the playing of the Star Spangled Banner. The race issue must be addressed at the ballot box and with legislative execution. The message has been delivered through protest. Now you must deliver administratively. You must work to effect change. You have the right to organize. You have the right to raise funds. You have the right to appoint leadership toward the cause.
Additionally, you must vote. Your credibility is lost when you do not vote. Rates of voting in a democracy should be ninety-five per cent and not sixty. Apathy is not a good enough reason not to vote. Voting is most critical when one is most vulnerable.
Stop thinking that the sporting arena is where you think you’re going to affect change. Be bold. Write your legislators. Write your letters to the editor. Start your blog. Fundraise for your candidate. Chronicle the injustice. Challenge bigots for their statements. Showcase politicians whose votes align with oppression. Read the constitution. Examine case law and interpretations of judgments. Support new protests with supplementary evidence. Request meetings with law makers through your organized association.
He was asked the inevitable question about Trump’s speech on Monday night and whether not commenting would send a message. Apparently, the time count to respond was 21 seconds and then referenced shortcomings in Canada in addressing the plight of “racialized Canadians”. Is he afraid of Trump? He may be. You know that if he said what he feels, he would be brandished by Trump given Trump’s incessant child minded need to retaliate criticism with insults. You know there would not likely be any good to come from directed remarks. Hence; let’s credit him with the silence. See – this conservative just gave credit to a liberal. If I can do it…you can do it.
For those who didn’t see this all coming with the election of Donald Trump…..well here you go. If you elect a POTUS void of a moral compass accompanied by corrupt cronies and a propensity for bullying in the spirit of self interest you are going to get problems. If you complement the character of the man with an elected body who feels threatened by his tactics of persecution through retribution, then you’ve actually compromised the ideals of democracy.
Is it okay to thrust logic into the covid pandemic equation? Let’s start with COVID-19 itself and its name. You see the folks in charge don’t seem to care that much about how they refer to it. First, it was Corona Virus but then someone said – no you can’t call it that because it’s only one type of Corona. Then it was assigned COVID-19 but then youtube was blocking this term because of its sterility and social media wasn’t generating the hits in lieu so folks went back to Corona Virus or “CV”. There seems to be much ambivalence now. Nobody really cares what you call it now because we all get the drift. However; the lack of succinctness in its name reference has eerily paralleled the lack on succinctness in executing policy around its existence.
Who is dying? It is the elderly and those who have “underlying conditions” mostly. Since there are few politically incorrect left who would dare opine online formally on a sensitive topic…i’ll just do it. I’ll say it. The elderly have been treated like second class citizens in the first world and this pandemic has elicited the fact. It’s a virus similar to others but more deadly and if you’re not in good health, it could take you out. Here is the thing – we are all going one day. However; had we treated the elderly better and provided them with the resources fitting of their esteemed contribution to society over their lives, they would have been better equipped to handle the pandemic. The allocation of health care dollars has been disproportionately been paid to doctors over aids to seniors. There is no escaping death but with so much treasure allocated toward health care, many deaths to seniors could have been prevented with better management of health care dollars.
You see. There are consequences to our conduct. If one votes
in a lame brain for a President, you should expect poor decision making. If you
vote in someone with poor character, expect decision making which reflects self
interest instead of the common interest. If a leader doesn’t heed the wisdom of
science and medical professionals then expect consequences of such irresponsibility
in policy. You get what you ask for. Death could come earlier for you as a
result of casting a vote carelessly. It seems like a stretch, right? But it’s
not if the dots keep lining up one after another. Just last night Mr. Trump
while standing at his podium pontificated injecting the body with
“disinfectant” as cure against COVID-19. He did so with a straight face so
Anderson Cooper brought in his medical panel for an interview on the subject.
If you hang carcasses of raw meat on the street for
sale…are you not asking for a problem? If you don’t do something about the
problem, do you really have reason to complain about coming down with a
disease? If some government authority believes you are being racist for
referencing the idiocy of hanging raw meat in the street, can you not take
exception on the premise of simply the meat and the practice as opposed to the
skin color of vendors of meat?
The frail needed acute protection at the outset but they
were merely administered the same regulatory policy as all others. It wasn’t
until long after numerous deaths did officials come to execute more precise
protocols around the target market of this virus. Now, a major block of the
populous is in lock down and financial quandary paying the price for officials’
complacency in permitting flights after the threat was discovered and
interpreted by medical professionals in tandem with a failure to protect the
frail with rigor at the outset.
I’ve made a habit of calling out the bull way before
COVID-19. Satire is one way of illuminating the ridiculous. Facebook friend OB
has presented George Carlin as an eloquent broadcaster of satire from the
comedy stage. Another way of bringing attention to incidences of bull is by
doing a logic drill down to discover source motive. The trouble with this
method is you need to be well researched because one flaw in your theory
weakens your posture.
One thing for certain becomes evident. Your governments don’t
believe you can conduct yourself with common sense. Or, they perpetrate policy
with a surreptitious motive of executing one policy in concert with executing a
larger purpose. Here is where we start
running into conspiracy theories.
Saving lives and health care finance are obviously worthy
causes. However; I do question the imposition of regulation without the
resources to enforce such regulation. Our governments have never endorsed using
non deputized citizens as law enforcement agents. Issues around civil liberties
become acute during a time when one entity starts behaving with misplaced
The COVID-19 story line is one where we see dribs and drabs
of regulation coloured with statistics and surprisingly muddled facts from
folks who claim to be experts. Then we have the wannabe experts who follow on
with their perceived social media empires believing that their message can fill
in for the factual void.
Of course despite the well publicized health recommendations
from official health authorities, we have tenants and landlords who want to
suddenly play hygiene and six foot police apparently ignorant of the
patronizing tone it bestows in a landscape where commercial vacancies are at
all time highs. Long term relationships are potentially jeopardized with naive
Let’s not forget the establishments which remain open but
then don’t want to serve anyway given the hysteria generated about germs. Want to
get glasses fitted but then be denied service despite the place being empty with
the doors open? We’ll remember who not to visit when things get back to normal.
We certainly don’t want to alienate long term relationships
through paranoia over a situation where we should be able to apply common sense
in the context of a broad message well heeded and well publicized from the
There was this accounting office where I spent a tax season in approximately 2004 here in Calgary. I showed up as a contractor and weaved my way into the inner fabric of a well established firm for this finite period. There was this guy on staff named Keith Corrigan. He struck me as kind of quirky but pleasant. I enjoyed his laid back approach to accounting and tax. He had an admirable confidence and he possessed supreme interpersonal skills. I didn’t have much to do with him since he was deployed on corporate work and I was tasked with personal returns. However; we had an unspoken agreement between us as we worked away in the office sharing the occasional witticisms. On April 30, while slaving away on the last couple of returns, in walks Keith looking for my invoice to get me settled up in anticipation of the wind up tax party. We took care of business, headed to the party, and subsequently lost contact with each other.
Fast forward to 2015, and I’m driving into the parking lot of the Smart Executive Centre and I see this slender fellow having a smoke and I’m thinking – “I know him”. We get reacquainted and I discover that he’s also taken up office residence here where I work. Our rapport is quickly reestablished and I begin to marvel at his experience and knack for story telling . We’ve had much in common with respect to tax and investing and together we would on occasion satirize unsavory positions taken by the CRA. Keith was a man fully blessed with common sense and deployed the trait eloquently with his subtle humor.
He recently died suddenly at the age of 59. I attended his Celebration of Life today and the event was informal and modest akin to the way he carried himself every day.
It’s happening whether you like it or not. The digital age is impacting your personal power and your ability to return fire. Here’s an example. Typically after a Uber ride, I will look to my phone so that I can acknowledge the tip request and send one. This morning I had a glaring message pop up with an “I understand” button having me acknowledge Uber’s reference to matters relevant to “behavior” as if my communication on my most recent ride did not meet their standard. It makes me think that my conversation with the driver was actually recorded without notifying me of such. I came to realize during the latter part of the ride that my driver may have been having difficulty understanding me given that English was his second language (he was wearing a turban). In humor, I had referenced the authoritative tone of the satellite guide woman giving directions and then gave her credit when she acknowledged me by name. Could this have been the offending reference? It’s all I can imagine given the completeness of my conversation with the driver.
You see, I used a little sarcasm during our ride to add color to the trip which may have been perceived as something different. I suspect this phenomenon will become less and less of a problem for people over time because people will just stop engaging in small talk flavored with witticism since it will be deemed too much trouble with a risk of negative consequences should banter be misunderstood. In other words, an experience of interpersonal connectedness will be extinguished due to an over sensitive culture awarded favor from daft elites lacking in common sense. After all, it was the Uber app that gave the final word in absence of a North American phone number on their website.
With all the testimony this week on Capitol Hill, believe it
or not there are still pockets of republican law makers squealing with
disbelief still that Trump is guilty as charged. Jim Jordan may be the last man standing and
late night stand up acts will certainly be targeting him for his formulation of
logic. Devin Nunes was another Republican so stained in partisanship over facts
that he thought that somehow by referencing “poor TV ratings” in an
intelligence hearing he’d sway the argument. With all the history of Trump’s
lies, deceit, attacks on the vulnerable, twitter tirades, spinning of a
conspiracy theory (Obama’s birth), associations with criminals (Manafort for
one), apparent deeds of sexual harassment according to some 16 women, countless
civil court cases prior to Presidency, obfuscation of publicizing financial
history (tax returns), personal attacks on citizens competing for presidential
nomination, business intent to operate in corrupt Russia, Mr. Nunes somehow
thought by referencing old newspaper headlines that conflating matters would
help his defence of this sham of a man, Trump.
It’s been a harrowing display of partisanship and very disappointing to witness this presidency along with Trump’s character to those who hold justice dear. It was a great experiment in populism projected onto the American people by voters contemptuous of being marginalized with powerlessness. Ironically, the man sent to Washington to address matters of the powerless has abused the power bestowed upon him and a lot of folks saw it coming including yours truly.
If one fails to
exercise objective thought in the face of political philosophy in a democracy,
there are implications. If one turns a blind eye, one will be caught. It may
not be today or tomorrow, but the facts will emerge. A steadfast adherence to
ideology is healthy but if the implementation of such ideology requires the
suppression and disregard to basic values and human rights, then such
implementation in democratic form will require a reset in order to extinguish
such aberrant conduct. While the trait of loyalty has absolute merit in the
context of executing team cause, blind loyalty tarnished with misdeed has inevitable
negative consequences including collateral damage. As a result of this Trump
debacle, it becomes apparent that the whistle blower provision worked and
thankfully there was an American sharp enough to step forward for the good of
country and his / her fellow patriot to out this reprehensible conduct of
bargaining political gain with earmarked military aid.
Incredulously, there is still the remote possibility that
Republicans will grasp at some kind of rationale for defending a no vote to
impeachment if proceedings actually make it to trial in absence of Trump’s
resignation. I am one conservative ideologue not blinded by partisan ideology
but strident in articulating repercussions from being stubborn and outright
indignant toward thoughtful discourse.
If you live in Western Canada and you don’t have a winter sport…consider downhill skiing. Here’s why I enjoy it so much.
It’s outside of your routine and you’ll be
amongst others like minded and keen in their pursuit of adventure
You’ll be astonished by the horizon draped
in glaciated peaks as you take a moment having exited the mountain’s highest
You’ll be trading stories about mountains,
runs, conditions, and travel.
Carving the snow and negotiating terrain
become objectives of pursuit. A skill set develops in the spirit of continuous
You will forget your day job. You will have
Start with lessons and advance. There is no
rush. You will not break a leg. Equipment offers protection.
Can you advance in terrain from season to season and challenge your fears?
Experience uniqueness in every mountain and
It’s something you guys can do together.
No two ski trips will be alike.